Valuing human capital and social capital doesn’t need “pretty pictures” — #OpenBadges #ePortfolios #blockchains #ledgers

In 2016, Open Badges will encounter blockchains and this will most likely change the way we issue, store and exploit Open Badges and open credentials. This change will also affect Open Badges themselves, or more precisely, we will have a chance to get rid of the dictatorship of the “pretty picture” and move beyond the narratives of the girl and boy scouts’ merit badges.

Open Badges are wonderful and it was a brilliant idea to store metadata within a picture, but let’s face it, there is a time, in fact many of them, where designing a “pretty picture” to recognise one’s achievements or competencies is simply a waste of time or a hindrance — and the use of pre-digested graphics often an insult to our sense of aesthetics! We have now reached the situation where it is the tail wagging the dog: the “pretty picture” is the “need to have” in order to issue any credential in the happy world of Open Badges. No “pretty picture”, no credential! Does it have to be so?

fromeptoledger

Moving the Open Badge movement from infancy to adulthood needs new metaphors and narratives — the badge for the girl and boy scouts. It is precisely what the blockchain technology is offering. The metaphor on which the blockchain narrative is constructed is the ledger, a word everybody can understand.

A general ledger account is an account or record used to sort and store balance sheet and income statement transactions. Examples of general ledger accounts include the asset accounts such as Cash, Accounts Receivable, Inventory, Investments, Land, and Equipment.
Source: www.accountingcoach.com/blog/what-is-a-general-ledger-account

A Personal Ledger is a means to account for one’s assets, credits and debts. In the context of open credentials, the credentials received can be considered as debts (one is indebted to someone for the trust received) and the credentials given as credits (the recipient of our trust is indebted to us). A ledger can be further subdivided into multiple accounts, so each entry could store the information contained today in various Open Badges.

And there is no reason to limit the entries of a ledger to represent Open Badges: the ledger is a faithful and trustworthy accounting of all our assets, and our assets are not limited to badges. Recording the evidence used to get credentials might be even more beneficial to an open credential process than the recording of the credentials themselves. In fact, the recording of evidence and associated endorsements (without having to issue a badge or a formal credential) might be just enough in many situations.

Moving the recording of credentials from “pretty pictures” to a ledger would also benefit the fight against OBesity — a possible outcome to OB addiction! Once we are fully able to issue credentials without the need for a picture,  we could then refocus our attention for Open Badges to things that really deserve a picture.

But more importantly, moving credentials to a ledger would be an opportunity to establish the foundations for a better representation of human and social capital.

Open Badges, ledgers, human and social capital

When addressing the issue of Open Badges and employment, the discussion is generally limited to using badges to get a job (my response: currently “spray and pray”) or to demonstrate continuing professional development. One area that has not yet been explored, is the use of Open Badges as a means for an organisation to account for its human capital. And the reason for this situation is probably due to the very concept of Open Badges, the lack of a holistic concept that would bring all of them together — and the Backpack was probably not the best metaphor to address human resource managers…

By moving our focus from “pretty pictures” to a ledger, we might have a chance to establish a line of communication with human resource managers and the executive management.

Are people an asset or a liability? For decades, accountants have categorised employees as a liability due to their salaries and future pensions. But in an era where more companies offer services instead of goods, and CEOs often talk about employees as their greatest asset, it is time for the 21st century ledger to match current rhetoric. […] Determining the actual value of this intangible asset is a difficult nut to crack. In 1978, 80% of a company’s value was easy to enumerate because it was mostly tangible assets such as factories and equipment. But now 80%of a company’s value is comprised of intangible assets such as brand value, intellectual property and, of course, people.
Source: Leon Kaye, in the Guardian

How could this 21st century ledger look like? What elements should it take into account?For example, how could a company account for the benefits gained from the interaction of its employees with the people that are not on its payroll, like the members of the communities of practices where staff members find support to solve business problems and promote the image of their company?

Brilliant system engineers can be dodgy social engineers!

One could imagine that the people who came up with the concept of ledger for blockchains (or the other way around!) would have worked on some kind of 21st century ledger in the sense discussed in the article quoted above. Unfortunately, after doing a bit of research with Google on blockchains, human resource and human capital I must confess that I was not able to find anything worth reporting, except my surprise that conversations related to organisations in the “blockchain milieu” did not seem to show any interest for the human factor, or when they did, it was to place it on the liability side of the “ledger,” just like with a 19th century ledger! I felt like I was reading a sequel of “Player Piano”, the Kurt Vonnegut’s novel where human work is considered as the main source of non-quality! Brilliant system engineers can be dodgy social engineers! The lessons learned from the Open Badges experience could certainly benefit the design of that 21st century, blockchain-based, ledger!

Another area that has not yet been explored is the use of Open Badges as a means to represent and value social capital — while Cities of Learning and the more recent LRNG initiative certainly contribute to the development of social capital, we are still far away from building any kind of representation of that social capital.

Social capital is defined by the OECD as: networks together with shared norms, values and understandings that facilitate co-operation within or among groups”. In this definition, we can think of networks as real-world links between groups or individuals. Think of networks of friends, family networks, networks of former colleagues, and so on. […] Put together, these networks and understandings engender trust and so enable people to work together.
Source: http://www.oecd.org/insights/37966934.pdf

It is interesting to note that in the OECD definition, trust is the main engine for the creation of social capital. Is there a way to represent trust, and trust networks? Well, Open Badges are precisely a means to represent trust between an issuer and an earner, so the analysis of trust relationships through collections of Open Badges might be a solution. Yet, as we have seen, not every trust relationship needs to be represented by a “pretty picture.” For example, I can decide that I trust someone or an organisation for something specific (honesty, good cook, brilliant data scientist) without having to loose any time finding or designing a “pretty picture” to represent it.

My (provisional) conclusions out of this short journey in the world of ledgers, human and social capital are:

  • Trust is the engine and the currency of human and social capital.
  • Personal Ledgers are a means to keep an accurate record of all personal assets: talents, competencies (skills, knowledge, attitudes and values) people, sharable resources, etc.
  • Ledgers can be combined, so Personal Ledgers, or part of them can be aggregated to create community ledgers, organisational ledgers or a territorial ledgers (e.g. build a representation of a learning city)
  • Personal Ledgers are the building blocks for establishing a representation of human and social capital!

Open Badge Passport and Personal Open Ledger.

Moving the storage of Open Credentials (Open Badges being part of them) to a Personal Open Ledger is an extension of the original ideas behind the development of the Open Badge Passport, one of the laureates of the DML Trust Challenge.

The Open Badge Passport enables the seamless sending, receipt, organisation, display, and search of digital badges. By establishing and nurturing networks of trust, it encourages the emergence of a new generation of services supporting learning, employment (including self-employment), social inclusion, and citizenship.

By introducing the Personal Open Ledger as the means for storing one’s personal assets, of all types, not just Open Badges, the Open (Badge) Passport will act as a kind of Personal Assets manager. Moreover, as the participants in the Personal Open Ledgers / Open Passports ecosystem would be connected through trust bonds (credits and debts of Bitof Trust, BoT) we would have the foundations for achieving the building of a dynamic, ever changing bottom-up trust network, something that will be discussed in a following post.

2 thoughts on “Valuing human capital and social capital doesn’t need “pretty pictures” — #OpenBadges #ePortfolios #blockchains #ledgers

  1. Shivam Agarwal says:

    Sir by reading your post i get a notion that block chain should be integrated with open badges just for the sake of trust ?? or is there any secondary use of open badges ??

    and even if trust is the only factor how to move further on the idea of integrating them , do u want to integrate open badges with the blocks that are created after every transaction ??

    • Serge says:

      Open Badges (and verifiable claims in general) do not need blockchains to be trustworthy: using asymmetric encryption to sign badges and claims is more than enough for that — to make them ‘verifiable’. The use of blockchains with badges at this stage of development, is mainly to cover for the shortcomings of the current Open Badge specification and implementation. Once we have signed badges using asymmetric encryption blockchains will become redundant.

      Once we have eliminated the need for blockchains to make badges trustworthy, we might find interesting ways to use blockchain technologies. One could be to store information related to revoked badges, other to share data within federation of services, etc.

      Anyhow, the choice to have one’s claim or not on a blockchain should be left to the individual, it should not be imposed by any authority, in particular educational institutions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *